The Head and The Heart.

My head wants a pragmatic leader capable of taking charge in cases of foreign relations and national security. This president would be enough of a centrist to accomplish some things I want for this country while making concessions in other areas, allowing for bipartisan reform with serviceable congressional relationships.

My heart hurts for the victims of the welfare gap, born into a persistent social class system designed to profit off of their collective labor and talents. My heart also wants a charismatic leader who governs with transparency and has the ability to draw out more of the >40 percent of the electorate who didn’t vote in 2012.

So which do you trust? The empathetic side led by a growing concern over social issues or the pragmatic centrist who may be able to actually push legislation through? Why do they two have to be mutually exclusive?

It’s been said that Bernie Sanders is the best thing to happen to the Clinton campaign. His far left rhetoric is forcing Hillary to adjust in ways inconceivable a year ago. And while Sanders is still a consensus 10 points behind Clinton, 10 percent of the party is undecided – leaving the candidates virtually neck and neck. This sort of competition is driving Clinton to call upon her dedicated voter blocs, like blacks and older women,while altering her positions just enough to appeal to the far left. Meanwhile Sanders is drawing in groups that don’t trust Clinton into the progressive fold and conversation.

My prediction is one of disappointment. Like many outspoken millennials, I would like Sanders to be elected on a surface level. But I know this shouldn’t happen. The last time the party elected a charismatic leader that united and inspired the electorate, he had a hard time getting legislation through a conservative Congress. I’d rather nominate a centrist whose ideas are enough to provide incremental change to the nation through congressional legislation. Somebody who has learned while failing under a microscope, like Hillary Clinton.

Bernie Sanders is necessary for this country, says my heart. His sharp rhetoric aimed at the systematic inequality our capitalist system breeds is telling. His brand of “radicalism” is needed to advance a conversation and shape the ideals of a nation.  However, I believe that change is best served in smaller bite-sized portions. Sanders is the nominee this country needs but doesn’t deserve.

I voted for Hillary because she has faced adversity and lost the public’s trust. Because she isn’t great with seeming genuine or appealing to the youth. Because she’s had to claw back from national humiliation served by her husband. Hillary knows foreign relations better than any other candidate in either party and has the most high level experience aside from Sanders, who excels with domestic policy but is otherwise lacking.

So I guess my head won.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “The Head and The Heart.

  1. While I didn’t vote for either of them, sometimes it is good to get an outside opinion.

    While Clinton appears to have moved further left, I believe that it is merely a sham of an attempt to gain some of Sander’s votes. Why vote for someone that is so quick to change positions to garner acceptance? While she may have the most upper level experience I can’t think of one major accomplishment that she achieved during her tenure as Secretary of State. My largest issue with her is her apparent lack of sincerity, and this isn’t a new issue. I’m still amused by her recollection of her landing in Bosnia while she was first lady. She claimed landing under sniper fire and having to duck and run for cover as soon as they were on the ground, of course the media called her on it and she had to say that she ‘misspoke'(http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/03/25/campaign.wrap/index.html?iref=hpmostpop). To me she comes off as the quintessential fake politician.

    Sanders on the other hand appears to legitimately believe in the issues he espouses, and while I certainly don’t agree with him on several key issues I certainly believe that he would make interesting change to our political landscape as president.

    I think that so long as we as a society continue voting for those we think are electable instead of those we truly believe in, we will perpetuate the same stagnant political ideas.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s